BMC Cancer (Jan 2023)

Detection of pancreatic cancer with two- and three-dimensional radiomic analysis in a nationwide population-based real-world dataset

  • Dawei Chang,
  • Po-Ting Chen,
  • Pochuan Wang,
  • Tinghui Wu,
  • Andre Yanchen Yeh,
  • Po-Chang Lee,
  • Yi-Hui Sung,
  • Kao-Lang Liu,
  • Ming-Shiang Wu,
  • Dong Yang,
  • Holger Roth,
  • Wei-Chih Liao,
  • Weichung Wang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10536-8
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background CT is the major detection tool for pancreatic cancer (PC). However, approximately 40% of PCs < 2 cm are missed on CT, underscoring a pressing need for tools to supplement radiologist interpretation. Methods Contrast-enhanced CT studies of 546 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma diagnosed by histology/cytology between January 2005 and December 2019 and 733 CT studies of controls with normal pancreas obtained between the same period in a tertiary referral center were retrospectively collected for developing an automatic end-to-end computer-aided detection (CAD) tool for PC using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) radiomic analysis with machine learning. The CAD tool was tested in a nationwide dataset comprising 1,477 CT studies (671 PCs, 806 controls) obtained from institutions throughout Taiwan. Results The CAD tool achieved 0.918 (95% CI, 0.895–0.938) sensitivity and 0.822 (95% CI, 0.794–0.848) specificity in differentiating between studies with and without PC (area under curve 0.947, 95% CI, 0.936–0.958), with 0.707 (95% CI, 0.602–0.797) sensitivity for tumors < 2 cm. The positive and negative likelihood ratios of PC were 5.17 (95% CI, 4.45–6.01) and 0.10 (95% CI, 0.08–0.13), respectively. Where high specificity is needed, using 2D and 3D analyses in series yielded 0.952 (95% CI, 0.934–0.965) specificity with a sensitivity of 0.742 (95% CI, 0.707–0.775), whereas using 2D and 3D analyses in parallel to maximize sensitivity yielded 0.915 (95% CI, 0.891–0.935) sensitivity at a specificity of 0.791 (95% CI, 0.762–0.819). Conclusions The high accuracy and robustness of the CAD tool supported its potential for enhancing the detection of PC.

Keywords