Acta Orthopaedica (Jul 2024)

Simultaneous correction of leg length discrepancy and angular deformity of the distal femur with retrograde Precice nails: a retrospective analysis of 45 patients

  • Bjoern Vogt,
  • Caja Biermann,
  • Georg Gosheger,
  • Andrea Laufer,
  • Anna Rachbauer,
  • Carina Antfang,
  • Milena Lueckingsmeier,
  • Gregor Toporowski,
  • Henning Tretow,
  • Robert Roedl,
  • Adrien Frommer

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.40947
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 95

Abstract

Read online

Background and purpose: Magnetically controlled motorized intramedullary lengthening nails (ILNs) can be employed for simultaneous correction of angular deformities of the distal femur and leg length discrepancy. This spares typical complications of external fixators but requires precise preoperative planning and exact intraoperative execution. To date, its results are insufficiently reported. We aimed to elucidate the following questions: (i) Is acute angular deformity correction and gradual femoral lengthening via a retrograde ILN a reliable and precise treatment option? (ii) What are the most common complications of treatment? Methods: Acute angular deformity correction and subsequent gradual lengthening of the distal femur with retrograde ILN was retrospectively analyzed in 45 patients (median patient age: 15 years, interquartile range [IQR] 13–19 and median follow-up: 40 months, IQR 31–50). Outcome parameters were accuracy, precision, reliability, bone healing, and complications of treatment. Results: The median distraction was 46 mm (IQR 29–49), median distraction and consolidation index 0.9 mm/day (IQR 0.7–1.0) and 29 days/cm (IQR 24–43), respectively. The median preoperative mechanical axis deviation (MAD) was 30 mm (IQR 23–39) in the varus cohort and –25 mm (IQR –29 to –15) in the valgus cohort and reduced to a mean of 8 mm (standard deviation [SD] 8) and –3 (SD 10), respectively. Accuracy, precision, and reliability of lengthening were 94%, 95% and 96%, respectively. Accuracy and precision of deformity correction were 92% and 89%, respectively. In total, 40/45 of patients achieved distraction with a difference of less than 1 cm from the initial plan and a postoperative MAD ranging from –10 mm to +15 mm. In 13/45 patients unplanned additional surgeries were conducted to achieve treatment goal with nonunion being the most frequent (4/45) and knee subluxation (3/45) the most severe complication. Conclusion: Acute deformity correction and subsequent lengthening of the distal femur with retrograde ILN is a reliable and accurate treatment achieving treatment goal in 89% but unplanned additional surgeries in 29% of patients should be anticipated.

Keywords