Inflammatory markers and noncoding‐RNAs responses to low and high compressions of HIIT with or without berberine supplementation in middle‐aged men with prediabetes

Abstract

Abstract This study compared the capacity of two different models of HIIT [high‐(HC) and low‐(LC) compression], with or without the use of berberine (BBR), on NOD‐like receptor pyrin domain‐containing protein‐3 (NLRP3), H19, interleukin (IL)‐1β, high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hs‐CRP), and insulin resistance markers. Fifty‐four middle‐aged men with overweight or obesity and prediabetes [fasting blood glucose (FBG) 110–180 mg/dL] were randomly and equally assigned to the HC, LC, HC + BBR, LC + BBR, BBR, and non‐exercising control (CON) groups. The HC (2:1 work‐to‐rest) and LC (1:1 work‐to‐rest) home‐based training programs included 2–4 sets of 8 exercises at 80%–95% HRmax, twice a week for 8 weeks. Participants in the berberine groups received approximately 1000 mg daily. All exercise interventions led to a significant reduction in hs‐CRP, IL‐1β, insulin, FBG, and insulin resistance index (HOMA‐IR) versus CON. Notably, there was a significant reduction in FBG and HOMA‐IR with the BBR group compared to the baseline. Both NLRP3 and H19 experienced a significant drop only with LC in comparison to the baseline. While both exercise protocols were beneficial overall, LC uniquely exhibited more anti‐inflammatory effects, as indicated by reductions in H19 and NLRP3. However, the addition of berberine to the exercise programs did not demonstrate additional benefits.

Keywords

• Berberine
• H19
• HIIT
• insulin resistance
• interleukin‐1β
• NLRP3