PLoS ONE (Jan 2020)

The role of structured reporting and structured operation planning in functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

  • Benjamin Philipp Ernst,
  • Manuel René Reissig,
  • Sebastian Strieth,
  • Jonas Eckrich,
  • Jan H Hagemann,
  • Julia Döge,
  • Christoph Matthias,
  • Haralampos Gouveris,
  • Johannes Rübenthaler,
  • Roxanne Weiss,
  • Wieland H Sommer,
  • Dominik Nörenberg,
  • Thomas Huber,
  • Phillipp Gonser,
  • Sven Becker,
  • Matthias F Froelich

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242804
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 11
p. e0242804

Abstract

Read online

Computed tomography (CT) scans represent the gold standard in the planning of functional endoscopic sinus surgeries (FESS). Yet, radiologists and otolaryngologists have different perspectives on these scans. In general, residents often struggle with aspects involved in both reporting and operation planning. The aim of this study was to compare the completeness of structured reports (SR) of preoperative CT images and structured operation planning (SOP) to conventional reports (CR) and conventional operation planning (COP) to potentially improve future treatment decisions on an individual level. In total, 30 preoperative CT scans obtained for surgical planning of patients scheduled for FESS were evaluated using SR and CR by radiology residents. Subsequently, otolaryngology residents performed a COP using free texts and a SOP using a specific template. All radiology reports and operation plannings were evaluated by two experienced FESS surgeons regarding their completeness for surgical planning. User satisfaction of otolaryngology residents was assessed by using visual analogue scales. Overall radiology report completeness was significantly higher using SRs regarding surgically important structures compared to CRs (84.4 vs. 22.0%, p<0.001). SOPs produced significantly higher completeness ratings (97% vs. 39.4%, p<0.001) regarding pathologies and anatomical variances. Moreover, time efficiency was not significantly impaired by implementation of SR (148 s vs. 160 s, p = 0.61) and user satisfaction was significantly higher for SOP (VAS 8.1 vs. 4.1, p<0.001). Implementation of SR and SOP results in a significantly increased completeness of radiology reports and operation planning for FESS. Consequently, the combination of both facilitates surgical planning and may decrease potential risks during FESS.