Frontiers in Oncology (Aug 2020)

Impact of Radiation Dose on Survival for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

  • Yang Yang,
  • Yang Yang,
  • Xiaofang Xu,
  • Xiaofang Xu,
  • Xia Zhou,
  • Xia Zhou,
  • Wuan Bao,
  • Wuan Bao,
  • Danhong Zhang,
  • Danhong Zhang,
  • Feiying Gu,
  • Feiying Gu,
  • Xianghui Du,
  • Xianghui Du,
  • Qixun Chen,
  • Qixun Chen,
  • Guoqin Qiu,
  • Guoqin Qiu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01431
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: Radiation dose used in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) varies in different trials and clinical practice.Methods and Materials: Data from patients diagnosed with ESCC receiving NCRT followed by esophagectomy were retrospectively collected from February 2013 to December 2017. Lower dose (LD) radiotherapy was defined as ≤45 Gy, and >45 Gy was considered as higher dose (HD). Survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with long-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify variables associated with survival.Results: A total of 118 patients treated with NCRT were included in our analysis: 62 patients received LD radiotherapy, and 56 patients received HD radiotherapy. The median follow-up time was 24.3 months (0.67–65.3 m). Two-years overall survival (OS) rates were 75.0 and 79.0% in HD and LD group, respectively (P = 0.360), and complete pathological remission (pCR) rates in two groups were 42.9 and 30.6%, respectively (P = 0.17). The incidences of toxic effects including post-operative complications were not significantly different between two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor T stage, M1a disease, smoking history, and pCR rate were significantly associated with OS.Conclusions: In ESCC patients treated with NCRT followed by surgery, higher radiation dose was not significantly associated with a higher pCR rate and longer survival. Lower radiation dose might be a preferable time-dose fraction scheme. Our finding needs to be further validated by randomized trials.

Keywords