Preventive Medicine Reports (Apr 2024)
Use of preventive service and potentially preventable hospitalization among American adults with disability: Longitudinal analysis of Traditional Medicare and commercial insurance
Abstract
Objective: Examine the association between traditional Medicare (TM) vs. commercial insurance and the use of preventive care and potentially preventable hospitalization (PPH) among adults (18+) with disability [cerebral palsy/spina bifida (CP/SB); multiple sclerosis (MS); traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI)] in the United States. Methods: Using 2008–2016 Medicare and commercial claims data, we compared adults with the same disability enrolled in TM vs. commercial insurance [Medicare: n = 21,599 (CP/SB); n = 7,605 (MS); n = 4,802 (TSCI); commercial: n = 11,306 (CP/SB); n = 6,254 (MS); n = 5,265 (TSCI)]. We applied generalized estimating equations to address repeated measures, comparing cases with controls. All models were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and comorbid conditions. Results: Compared with commercial insurance, enrolling in TM reduced the odds of using preventive services. For example, adjusted odds ratios (OR) of annual wellness visits in TM vs. commercial insurance were 0.31 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28–0.34), 0.32 (95% CI: 0.28–0.37), and 0.19 (95% CI: 0.17–0.22) among adults with CP/SB, TSCI, and MS, respectively. Furthermore, PPH risks were higher in TM vs. commercial insurance. ORs of PPH in TM vs. commercial insurance were 1.50 (95% CI: 1.18–1.89), 1.83 (95% CI: 1.40–2.41), and 2.32 (95% CI: 1.66–3.22) among adults with CP/SB, TSCI, and MS, respectively. Moreover, dual-eligible adults had higher odds of PPH compared with non-dual-eligible adults [CP/SB: OR = 1.47 (95% CI: 1.25–1.72); TSCI: OR = 1.61 (95% CI: 1.35–1.92), and MS: OR = 1.80 (95% CI: 1.55–2.10)]. Conclusions: TM, relative to commercial insurance, was associated with lower receipt of preventive care and higher PPH risk among adults with disability.
