BMC Cancer (Nov 2011)

Clinicopathologic and gene expression parameters predict liver cancer prognosis

  • Hao Ke,
  • Lamb John,
  • Zhang Chunsheng,
  • Xie Tao,
  • Wang Kai,
  • Zhang Bin,
  • Chudin Eugene,
  • Lee Nikki P,
  • Mao Mao,
  • Zhong Hua,
  • Greenawalt Danielle,
  • Ferguson Mark D,
  • Ng Irene O,
  • Sham Pak C,
  • Poon Ronnie T,
  • Molony Cliona,
  • Schadt Eric E,
  • Dai Hongyue,
  • Luk John M

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-481
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 1
p. 481

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) varies following surgical resection and the large variation remains largely unexplained. Studies have revealed the ability of clinicopathologic parameters and gene expression to predict HCC prognosis. However, there has been little systematic effort to compare the performance of these two types of predictors or combine them in a comprehensive model. Methods Tumor and adjacent non-tumor liver tissues were collected from 272 ethnic Chinese HCC patients who received curative surgery. We combined clinicopathologic parameters and gene expression data (from both tissue types) in predicting HCC prognosis. Cross-validation and independent studies were employed to assess prediction. Results HCC prognosis was significantly associated with six clinicopathologic parameters, which can partition the patients into good- and poor-prognosis groups. Within each group, gene expression data further divide patients into distinct prognostic subgroups. Our predictive genes significantly overlap with previously published gene sets predictive of prognosis. Moreover, the predictive genes were enriched for genes that underwent normal-to-tumor gene network transformation. Previously documented liver eSNPs underlying the HCC predictive gene signatures were enriched for SNPs that associated with HCC prognosis, providing support that these genes are involved in key processes of tumorigenesis. Conclusion When applied individually, clinicopathologic parameters and gene expression offered similar predictive power for HCC prognosis. In contrast, a combination of the two types of data dramatically improved the power to predict HCC prognosis. Our results also provided a framework for understanding the impact of gene expression on the processes of tumorigenesis and clinical outcome.