Frontiers in Oncology (Nov 2022)

Comparative analysis of dosimetry and predictive somatotype parameters of prone and supine whole-breast irradiation among Chinese women after breast-conserving surgery

  • Yi Gao,
  • Li Wang,
  • Han Bai,
  • Xiang Pan,
  • Lan Li,
  • Li Chang,
  • Yaoxiong Xia,
  • Wenhui Li,
  • Yu Hou

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1011805
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

PurposeFinding a better treatment position (prone or supine) for whole-breast irradiation for Chinese female patients diagnosed with breast cancer by identify the associations between predictive somatotype parameters and dosimetric gains.Materials and methodsTwo volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were deployed for whole-breast irradiation in supine and prone position with a total dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Dose-volume parameters were compared and analysed both in the target volume and organs at risk, and equivalent uniform dose-based figure-of-merit (fEUD) models were further used to quantitatively evaluate the overall merits of the two plans. Body shape parameters, including body mass index (BMI), body surface area (BSA), breast shape, cup size, bust size and chest size, were collected. Anatomic features such as the central heart distance (CHD) were measured on supine CT. Spearman’s correlation analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and the linear regression models were conducted.ResultsDoses to the heart and left anterior descending coronary artery (LADCA) are greater in left-sided breast cancer (BC) patients in the prone position than in the supine position, and the opposite was true for right-sided BC patients (p<0.001). 19 of 63 patients (5 left-sided and 14 right-sided BC) achieved greater benefit from the prone position according to the fEUD score. Right-sided BC patients with a bust size ≥92.25 cm, drop-type breasts and cup size ≥B are very likely to benefit from prone-position radiotherapy. The CHD is significantly positively associated with △fEUD among right-sided BC patients (rho=0.506, p=0.004). Using a cut-off point of 2.215, the CHD had 71.4% sensitivity and 81.2% specificity in predicting a successful prone plan.ConclusionsRight-sided BC patients had better dosimetric gain in the prone position than left-sided BC patients. The CHD is an especially good and novel predictor that could help to select prone-benefitting right-sided BC patients.

Keywords