Advances in Radiation Oncology (Jan 2023)

Effect of Favorable Pathologic Response After Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy Alone in Soft-tissue Sarcoma

  • Russell F. Palm, MD,
  • Casey L. Liveringhouse, MD,
  • Ricardo J. Gonzalez, MD,
  • Marilyn M. Bui, MD,
  • Odion Binitie, MD,
  • George Q. Yang, MD,
  • Arash O. Naghavi, MD, MS

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 1
p. 101086

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: Whether the therapeutic response of soft-tissue sarcoma to neoadjuvant treatment is predictive for clinical outcomes is unclear. Given the rarity of this disease and the confounding effects of chemotherapy, this study analyzes whether a favorable pathologic response (fPR) after neoadjuvant radiation therapy (RT) alone is associated with clinical benefits. Methods and Materials: An institutional review board-approved retrospective review was conducted on a database of patients with primary soft-tissue sarcoma treated at our institution between 1987 and 2015 with neoadjuvant RT alone followed by surgical resection. Time-to-event outcomes estimated with a Kaplan–Meier analysis included overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control, and distant control (DC). Cox regression analyses were performed to determine prognostic variables associated with clinical outcomes. Results: Of the overall cohort of 315 patients, 181 patients (57%) were included in the primary analysis with documented pathologic necrosis (PN) rates (mean: 59%) and a median follow up from diagnosis of 48 months (range, 4-170 months). The median neoadjuvant RT dose was 50 Gy (range, 40-60 Gy), and the majority of patients had negative surgical margins (79%). Only 35 patients (19%) achieved a fPR (PN ≥95%), which was associated with a higher R0 resection rate (94% vs. 75%; P = .013), a significant 5-year PFS benefit (74% vs. 43%; P = .014), and a nonsignificant 5-year DC benefit (76% vs. 62%; P = .12) compared with PN <95%. On multivariable analysis, fPR was an independent predictor for PFS (hazard ratio: 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.90; P = .022). Conclusions: Achieving fPR with neoadjuvant RT alone is associated with a higher R0 resection rate and possible DC benefit, translating into a significant improvement in PFS. Further studies to improve pathologic response rates and prospectively validate this endpoint are warranted.