Molecules (Nov 2023)

Analysis of the Differences in Volatile Organic Compounds in Different Rice Varieties Based on GC-IMS Technology Combined with Multivariate Statistical Modelling

  • Jin Chen,
  • Ying Liu,
  • Mi Yang,
  • Xinmin Shi,
  • Yuqin Mei,
  • Juan Li,
  • Chunqi Yang,
  • Shihuang Pu,
  • Jiancheng Wen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28227566
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 28, no. 22
p. 7566

Abstract

Read online

In order to investigate the flavour characteristics of aromatic, glutinous, and nonaromatic rice, gas chromatography–ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS) was used to analyse the differences in volatile organic compounds (VOCs) amongst different rice varieties. The results showed that 103 signal peaks were detected in these rice varieties, and 91 volatile flavour substances were identified. Amongst them, 28 aldehydes (28.89~31.17%), 24 alcohols (34.85~40.52%), 14 ketones (12.26~14.74%), 12 esters (2.30~4.15%), 5 acids (7.80~10.85%), 3 furans (0.30~0.68%), 3 terpenes (0.34~0.64%), and 2 species of ethers (0.80~1.78%) were detected. SIMCA14.1 was used to perform principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis, and some potential character markers (VIP > 1) were further screened out of the 91 flavour substances identified based on the variable important projections, including ethanol, 1-hexanol, hexanal, heptanal, nonanal, (E)-2-heptenal, octanal, trans-2-octenal, pentanal, acetone, 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one, ethyl acetate, propyl acetate, acetic acid, and dimethyl sulphide. Based on the established fingerprint information, combined with principal component analysis and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis, different rice varieties were also effectively classified, and the results of this study provide data references for the improvement in aromatic rice varieties.

Keywords