JCI Insight (Dec 2020)

Hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis and treatment is ineffective in macaque and hamster SARS-CoV-2 disease models

  • Kyle Rosenke,
  • Michael A. Jarvis,
  • Friederike Feldmann,
  • Benjamin Schwarz,
  • Atsushi Okumura,
  • Jamie Lovaglio,
  • Greg Saturday,
  • Patrick W. Hanley,
  • Kimberly Meade-White,
  • Brandi N. Williamson,
  • Frederick Hansen,
  • Lizette Perez-Perez,
  • Shanna Leventhal,
  • Tsing-Lee Tang-Huau,
  • Julie Callison,
  • Elaine Haddock,
  • Kaitlin A. Stromberg,
  • Dana Scott,
  • Graham Sewell,
  • Catharine M. Bosio,
  • David Hawman,
  • Emmie de Wit,
  • Heinz Feldmann

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 23

Abstract

Read online

We remain largely without effective prophylactic/therapeutic interventions for COVID-19. Although many human COVID-19 clinical trials are ongoing, there remains a deficiency of supportive preclinical drug efficacy studies to help guide decisions. Here we assessed the prophylactic/therapeutic efficacy of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), a drug of interest for COVID-19 management, in 2 animal disease models. The standard human malaria HCQ prophylaxis (6.5 mg/kg given weekly) and treatment (6.5 mg/kg given daily) did not significantly benefit clinical outcome, nor did it reduce SARS-CoV-2 replication/shedding in the upper and lower respiratory tract in the rhesus macaque disease model. Similarly, when used for prophylaxis or treatment, neither the standard human malaria dose (6.5 mg/kg) nor a high dose (50 mg/kg) of HCQ had any beneficial effect on clinical disease or SARS-CoV-2 kinetics (replication/shedding) in the Syrian hamster disease model. Results from these 2 preclinical animal models may prove helpful in guiding clinical use of HCQ for prophylaxis/treatment of COVID-19.

Keywords