Using Digital PCR to Unravel the Occurrence of Piroplasmids, <i>Bartonella</i> spp., and <i>Borrelia</i> spp. in Wild Animals from Brazil
Ana Cláudia Calchi,
Anna Claudia Baumel Mongruel,
Fernanda Beatriz Pereira Cavalcanti,
Lilliane Bartone,
José Maurício Barbanti Duarte,
Emília Patrícia Medici,
Danilo Kluyber,
Mayara G. Caiaffa,
Mario Henrique Alves,
Arnaud Leonard Jean Desbiez,
Taciana Fernandes Souza Barbosa Coelho,
Rosangela Zacarias Machado,
Edward B. Breitschwerdt,
Ricardo G. Maggi,
Marcos Rogério André
Affiliations
Ana Cláudia Calchi
Vector-Borne Bioagents Laboratory (VBBL), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences (FCAV), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil
Anna Claudia Baumel Mongruel
Vector-Borne Bioagents Laboratory (VBBL), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences (FCAV), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil
Fernanda Beatriz Pereira Cavalcanti
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterinárias, FCAV-UNESP, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil
Lilliane Bartone
Intracellular Pathogens Research Laboratory, Comparative Medicine Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA
José Maurício Barbanti Duarte
Deer Research and Conservation Center (NUPECCE), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil
Emília Patrícia Medici
Lowland Tapir Conservation Initiative (LTCI), Instituto de Pesquisas Ecológicas (IPÊ), Nazaré Paulista 12960-000, SP, Brazil
Danilo Kluyber
ICAS—Instituto de Conservacao de Animais Silvestres, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul 79040-290, MS, Brazil
Mayara G. Caiaffa
ICAS—Instituto de Conservacao de Animais Silvestres, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul 79040-290, MS, Brazil
Mario Henrique Alves
ICAS—Instituto de Conservacao de Animais Silvestres, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul 79040-290, MS, Brazil
Arnaud Leonard Jean Desbiez
ICAS—Instituto de Conservacao de Animais Silvestres, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul 79040-290, MS, Brazil
Taciana Fernandes Souza Barbosa Coelho
Section of Arbovirology and Hemorrhagic Fevers, Coordinator of the Rabies Diagnosis Laboratory, Evandro Chagas Institute MS-SVS, São Brás, Belém 66093-020, PA, Brazil
Rosangela Zacarias Machado
Vector-Borne Bioagents Laboratory (VBBL), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences (FCAV), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil
Edward B. Breitschwerdt
Intracellular Pathogens Research Laboratory, Comparative Medicine Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA
Ricardo G. Maggi
Intracellular Pathogens Research Laboratory, Comparative Medicine Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA
Marcos Rogério André
Vector-Borne Bioagents Laboratory (VBBL), Department of Pathology, Reproduction and One Health, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences (FCAV), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil
Piroplasmids (Babesia spp., Rangelia spp., Theileria spp., Cytauxzoon spp.) are tick-borne apicomplexan protozoa that infect, depending on the species, erythrocytes and leucocytes in a wide variety of mammals and birds. The genera Bartonella and Borrelia include vector-borne bacteria that can infect and cause disease in both animals and humans. Detection of hemotropic bacteria and piroplasmids in wild animals is often challenging due to low bacteremia or parasitemia. Digital (d)PCR has proven to be an effective modality for the detection and quantification of DNA of hemotropic pathogens with low parasitemia. This study compared dPCR results from 366 biological samples from seven different Brazilian wild animal groups (5 Xenarthra species, 5 deer species, 3 felid species, 1 canid species, 3 rodent species, 1 bat species, 1 tapir species, and 12 bird species) to two other molecular diagnostic techniques: quantitative real-time (qPCR) and nested (nPCR). For this study, DNA extracted from wild animal blood and spleen samples were subjected to a multiplex dPCR assay for piroplasmids, Bartonella spp., and Borrelia spp. For comparison, the same primers and probes for each agent were used in qPCR assays. Additionally, an nPCR based on the 18S rRNA gene for piroplasmids was performed. The proportions of positive results obtained using dPCR were 85.5% for piroplasmids, 33.6% for Bartonella spp., and 16.7% for Borrelia spp. For all tested agents, dPCR proved to be the technique with the highest sensitivity, making it a useful tool for screening vector-borne agents in biological samples from wild animals with low parasitemia.