Lateral Instability in Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Comparison Between the Brostrom-Gould and Anatomic Lateral Ankle Stabilization (ATLAS)

Abstract

Category: Ankle; Sports; Other Introduction/Purpose: Lateral ankle instability is not uncommon after osseous cuts and soft tissue releases are performed during Total Ankle Arthroplasty (TAA), particularly with varus malalignment. The purpose of the present study was to compare the outcomes of ankles that underwent TAA with concurrent Brostrom-Gould (BG) or Anatomic Lateral Ankle Stabilization (ATLAS) at a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Methods: Thirty-eight TAA's underwent BG (21 INFINITY, 4 CADENCE) or ATLAS (13 INBONE-2) between August 2015 and February 2019 at a single institution and were at least 1 year postoperative (mean 18.3 months, range 12-40). Baseline patient demographics, characteristics, and operative factors were assessed via medical record and chart reviews. Radiographs parameters were measured preoperatively, at 6 weeks postoperative, and during the latest follow-up. Revisions, reoperations, and complications were classified according to the criteria established by Vander Griend et al. and Glazebrook et el., respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: Survivorship for TAA with concurrent BG/ATLAS was 97%. Overall, TAA with concurrent BG had higher incidences of early TAA revision (4%), recurrent instability (4%), reoperation (16%), and complications (29%) compared to ATLAS. Postoperative coronal and sagittal tibiotalar alignment changes were significant for both groups (p< 0.001, p=0.014); however, the differences were greater for ATLAS (p= 0.045, p<0.001). Conclusion: The present study is the first to compare outcomes between techniques for addressing ankle instability in the TAA population. At short-term follow-up, anatomic reconstruction produced better outcomes than the traditional BG procedure. Additional comparative studies between techniques to address instability in the TAA population are warranted.