Brain Sciences (Apr 2024)

Deep Learning-Driven Estimation of Centiloid Scales from Amyloid PET Images with <sup>11</sup>C-PiB and <sup>18</sup>F-Labeled Tracers in Alzheimer’s Disease

  • Tensho Yamao,
  • Kenta Miwa,
  • Yuta Kaneko,
  • Noriyuki Takahashi,
  • Noriaki Miyaji,
  • Koki Hasegawa,
  • Kei Wagatsuma,
  • Yuto Kamitaka,
  • Hiroshi Ito,
  • Hiroshi Matsuda

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14040406
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 4
p. 406

Abstract

Read online

Background: Standard methods for deriving Centiloid scales from amyloid PET images are time-consuming and require considerable expert knowledge. We aimed to develop a deep learning method of automating Centiloid scale calculations from amyloid PET images with 11C-Pittsburgh Compound-B (PiB) tracer and assess its applicability to 18F-labeled tracers without retraining. Methods: We trained models on 231 11C-PiB amyloid PET images using a 50-layer 3D ResNet architecture. The models predicted the Centiloid scale, and accuracy was assessed using mean absolute error (MAE), linear regression analysis, and Bland–Altman plots. Results: The MAEs for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and young controls (YC) were 8.54 and 2.61, respectively, using 11C-PiB, and 8.66 and 3.56, respectively, using 18F-NAV4694. The MAEs for AD and YC were higher with 18F-florbetaben (39.8 and 7.13, respectively) and 18F-florbetapir (40.5 and 12.4, respectively), and the error rate was moderate for 18F-flutemetamol (21.3 and 4.03, respectively). Linear regression yielded a slope of 1.00, intercept of 1.26, and R2 of 0.956, with a mean bias of −1.31 in the Centiloid scale prediction. Conclusions: We propose a deep learning means of directly predicting the Centiloid scale from amyloid PET images in a native space. Transferring the model trained on 11C-PiB directly to 18F-NAV4694 without retraining was feasible.

Keywords