Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology (Oct 2024)

Reliability and validation of an electronic penicillin allergy risk-assessment tool in a pregnant population

  • Joanne Wang,
  • Chelsea Elwood,
  • Vanessa Paquette,
  • Natasha Kwan,
  • Stephanie Erdle,
  • Melissa Watt,
  • Julie Van Schalkwyk,
  • Jeffrey N. Bone,
  • Ashley Roberts,
  • Raymond Mak,
  • Tiffany Wong

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-024-00918-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 20, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Penicillin allergy adversely impacts patient care, yet most cases do not have true allergies. Clinicians require efficient, reliable clinical tools to identify low risk patients who can be safely de-labeled. Our center implemented the FIRSTLINE electronic point-of-care decision support tool to help non-allergist practitioners risk stratify patients with penicillin allergy. We sought to explore the reliability and validity of this tool in relation to allergist assessment and actual patient outcomes. We additionally compared it with two other published stratification tools, JAMA and PENFAST, to assess ability to accurately identify low risk patients appropriate for direct oral challenge. Methods In this single-center, retrospective, observational study, 181 pregnant females with self-reported penicillin allergy between July 2019 to June 2021 at BC Women’s Hospital, Vancouver, Canada were used to assess the reliability and validity of all three tools. Physician-guided history of penicillin use and symptoms were used for scoring. Results and recommendations were compared to actual patient outcomes after clinician decision for direct oral challenge or intradermal tests. We compared the performance of JAMA, PENFAST and FIRSTLINE. Results 181 patients were assessed. 176/181 (97.2%) patients were deemed not allergic. Each risk stratification tool labelled majority of patients as low risk with 88.4% of patients PENFAST 0–2, 60.2% of patients JAMA low risk, 86.7% of patients FIRSTLINE very low risk. Conclusion We demonstrate that our point-of-care electronic algorithm is reliable in identifying low risk pregnant patients, as compared to an allergist assessment. To our knowledge, this is the first study to provide direct comparison between multiple decision support tools using the same population, minimizing participant bias. Providing clinical algorithms to risk stratify patients, can enable healthcare professionals to safely identify individuals who may be candidates for direct penicillin oral challenges versus needing referral to specialists. This increases the generalizability and efficiency of penicillin allergy de-labeling.

Keywords