BMJ Open (Sep 2021)

Responses of physicians to an objective safety and quality knowledge test: a cross-sectional study

  • Heidi B King,
  • Harry B Burke

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040779
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 9

Abstract

Read online

Objective For physicians to practice safe high quality medicine they must have sufficient safety and quality knowledge. Although a great deal is known about the safety and quality perceptions, attitudes and beliefs of physicians, little is known about their safety and quality knowledge. This study tested the objective safety and quality knowledge of practicing US primary care physicians.Design Cross-sectional objective test of safety and quality knowledge.Setting Primary care physicians practicing in the USA.Participants Study consisted of 518 US practicing primary care physicians who answered an email invitation. Fifty-four percent were family medicine and 46% were internal medicine physicians.The response rate was 66%.Intervention The physicians took a 24-question multiple-choice test over the internet.Outcome The outcome was the percent correct.Results The average number of correct answers was 11.4 (SD, 2.69), 48% correct. Three common clinical vignettes questions were answered correctly by 45% of the physicians. Five common radiation exposures questions were answered correctly by 40% of the physicians. Seven common healthcare quality and safety questions were answered correctly by 43% of the physicians. Seven Donabedian’s model of structure, process and outcome measure questions were answered correctly by 67% of the physicians. Two Institute of Medicine’s definitions of quality and safety questions were answered correctly by 19.5% of the physicians.Conclusion Forty-eight per cent of the physicians’ answers to the objective safety and quality questions were correct. To our knowledge, this is the first assessment of the objective safety and quality knowledge of practicing US primary care physicians.