Shiyan dongwu yu bijiao yixue (Jun 2022)

A Comparative Analysis of CNAS Laboratory Animal Institutions Accreditation and AAALAC Certification

  • WU Xiaohuai,
  • XIAO Qiaozhe,
  • PANG Wanyong,
  • BAI Yu,
  • LI Yao,
  • LU Xuancheng,
  • FENG Tao

DOI
https://doi.org/10.12300/j.issn.1674-5817.2022.033
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 42, no. 3
pp. 237 – 243

Abstract

Read online

China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment (CNAS) laboratory animal institutions accreditation is an important system for the management of laboratory animals in China. It is a third-party evaluation on Chinese characteristics dedicated to ensuring the quality and welfare of laboratory animals in China. The American Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC) certification provides global services about animal welfare evaluation and ethical certification, which are important for management and use of laboratory animals. This study compared and analyzed the nature of CNAS and AAALAC, the nature of CNAS accreditation and AAALAC certification, the evaluation principles, required documents, the evaluation process, the management of reviewers, and the acceptance of results, and discussed the differences and characteristics of the two evaluation systems for laboratory animal institutions.

Keywords