ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research (Sep 2022)
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® Test in Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer
Abstract
Vladislav Berdunov,1 Steve Millen,2 Andrew Paramore,2 Jane Griffin,3 Sarah Reynia,2 Nina Fryer,2 Rebecca Brown,1 Louise Longworth1 1PHMR Ltd, London, UK; 2Exact Sciences, London, UK; 3Jane Griffin Associates, East Molesey, UKCorrespondence: Vladislav Berdunov, PHMR Ltd, Berkeley Works, Berkley Grove, London, NW1 8XY, UK, Tel +44 20 3432 7450, Email [email protected]: The 21-gene assay (the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® test) is a validated multigene assay which produces the Recurrence Score® result (RS) to inform decisions on the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), hormone receptor positive (HR+) early invasive breast cancer. A model-based economic evaluation estimated the cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene assay against the use of clinical risk tools alone based on the latest evidence from prospective studies.Methods: The proportion of patients assigned to chemotherapy conditional on their RS result was obtained from retrospective data from the Clalit registry. The probability of distant recurrence with endocrine and chemo-endocrine therapy conditional on RS result was obtained from TAILORx and NSABP B-20 trials. The cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene assay compared to using clinical risk tools alone was estimated in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) over a lifetime horizon.Results: The 21-gene assay was more effective (0.17 more quality-adjusted life years) at a lower cost (-£ 519) over a lifetime compared to clinical risk alone. The model results were sensitive to assumptions around the magnitude of benefit of chemotherapy in the high RS result subgroup. Other assumptions underpinning the model, such as the proportion of patients assigned to chemotherapy in the low and mid-range RS result subgroups and long-term distant recurrence probabilities, had a smaller impact on the results.Conclusion: The analysis showed that the cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene assay is sensitive to assumptions for chemotherapy sparing for patients with RS 0– 25 whose outcomes with endocrine therapy are no worse compared to chemotherapy-assigned patients, and a chemotherapy benefit in the RS 26– 100 group. Future studies need to incorporate a wider set of tumour profiling tests other than the 21-gene assay to allow a direct comparison of their cost-effectiveness.Keywords: cost-effectiveness, multigene assay, breast cancer, chemotherapy, the Oncotype DX test, 21-gene assay
