BMC Medical Education (Sep 2024)

Breaking bad news: an active learning method for medical students

  • Laura Polivka,
  • C. Delcour,
  • H. Dufresne,
  • S. Bartoli,
  • P. Bataille,
  • L. Bekel,
  • J. Bonigen,
  • E. Deladrière,
  • S. Dimarcq,
  • A. Felix,
  • C. Havas,
  • H. Le Goff,
  • M. Levy,
  • E. Riback,
  • A. Welfringer-Morin,
  • V. Houdouin,
  • S. Hadj-Rabia,
  • C. Bodemer,
  • A. Faye,
  • I. Melki

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05821-4
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Breaking bad news is one of the most difficult aspects of communication in medicine. The objective of this study was to assess the relevance of a novel active learning course on breaking bad news for fifth-year students. Methods Students were divided into two groups: Group 1, the intervention group, participated in a multidisciplinary formative discussion workshop on breaking bad news with videos, discussions with a pluri-professional team, and concluding with the development of a guide on good practice in breaking bad news through collective intelligence; Group 2, the control group, received no additional training besides conventional university course. The relevance of discussion-group-based active training was assessed in a summative objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) station particularly through the students’ communication skills. Results Thirty-one students were included: 17 in Group 1 and 14 in Group 2. The mean (range) score in the OSCE was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (10.49 out of 15 (7; 13) vs. 7.80 (4.75; 12.5), respectively; p = 0.0007). The proportion of students assessed by the evaluator to have received additional training in breaking bad news was 88.2% (15 of the 17) in Group 1 and 21.4% (3 of the 14) in Group 2 (p = 0.001). The intergroup differences in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and Jefferson Scale of Empathy scores were not significant, and both scores were not correlated with the students’ self-assessed score for success in the OSCE. Conclusion Compared to the conventional course, this new active learning method for breaking bad news was associated with a significantly higher score in a summative OSCE. A longer-term validation study is needed to confirm these exploratory data.

Keywords