Comparable Outcomes of Cartiva Implant, Cheilectomy, and Fusion for Hallux Rigidus of the 1st Metatarsophalangeal Joint: A Matched Cohort Study

Abstract

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Other Introduction/Purpose: The primary goal of treating hallux rigidus of the 1st metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint of the foot is to reduce pain. Treatment options include cheilectomy, interposition arthroplasty, and arthrodesis for more severe disease. Recently, the use of a synthetic cartilage implant (Cartiva, Stryker Inc., MI, USA) has been introduced with the advantage of motion preservation. While a Level 1 study has demonstrated similar outcomes of fusion and Cartiva, other comparative studies have shown less favorable results for the Cartiva implant. The purpose of this study was to evaluate minimum 2-year patient reported outcomes (PROs) of the Cartiva implant for the treatment of hallux rigidus in the 1st MTP joint in comparison to a matched cohort of patients treated with fusion or cheilectomy. Methods: Patients >18 years old who underwent surgery for treatment of 1st MTP joint hallux rigidus with Cartiva implant, cheilectomy, or fusion performed by two surgeons (T.O.C. or C.T.H.) between January 2009 and January 2020 were identified. A 2:1 matched control cohort of patients who underwent cheilectomy or fusion was constructed using a nearest neighbor, greedy algorithm based on age, sex, prior surgery, and Coughlin osteoarthritis grade. Minimum 2-year follow-up was obtained with patients completing subjective questionnaires including Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sport subscales, Short Form-12 (SF-12), Tegner activity scale, and patient satisfaction with surgical outcome. Demographics and patient-reported outcomes were compared between groups. Results: Follow-up was obtained for 22/27 (82%) Cartiva patients (mean age 54±19) at median 4.3 years and 41/49 (84%) control patients (mean age 58±11) at median 3.5 years. Prevalence of Coughlin grade was similar between Cartiva and control groups (6 vs 10 grade 1, 8 vs 15 grade 2, 2 vs 6 grade 4, 6 vs 10 grade 5; p=.93), respectively. There was no significant difference in median post-operative FAAM-ADL (96 vs 95, p=.53), FAAM-Sport (92 vs 89, p=.89), SF-12 PCS (56 vs 51, p=.054), SF-12 MCS (56.3 vs 57.5, p=.50), Tegner score (4 vs 3, p=.30), or patient satisfaction (9 vs 9, p=.91) between Cartiva and control cohorts, respectively. Revision surgery was required for 3 (14%) Cartiva patients and 4 (10%) control patients (p=.70). Conclusion: Patients treated with a Cartiva synthetic cartilage implant for 1st MTP joint hallux rigidus had similar patient-reported outcomes and revision rate compared to patients treated with cheilectomy or fusion for Coughlin grade 2-5 osteoarthritis.