Malaria Journal (Jun 2024)

Core principles of Malakit intervention for transferability in other contexts

  • Maylis Douine,
  • Yann Lambert,
  • Muriel Suzanne Galindo,
  • Irene Jimeno Maroto,
  • Teddy Bardon,
  • Lorraine Plessis,
  • Louise Mutricy,
  • Jane Bordallo-Miller,
  • Mathieu Nacher,
  • Antoine Adenis,
  • Hedley Cairo,
  • Hélène Hiwat,
  • Stephen Vreden,
  • Carlotta Carboni,
  • Alice Sanna,
  • Martha Suarez-Mutis

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-024-05002-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract To eliminate malaria, all populations must be included. For those who are not reached by the health care system, specific interventions must be tailor-made. An innovative Malakit strategy, based on the distribution of self-diagnosis and self-treatment kits, has been evaluated in the Suriname-French Guiana- Amapá (Brazil) region. The results showed effectiveness and good acceptability. The Malakit intervention is complex and has many components. Its transferability requires adaptation to other populations and regions, while retaining the main features of the intervention. This article provides the keys to adapting, implementing and evaluating it in other contexts facing residual malaria in hard-to-reach and/or mobile populations. The process of transferring this intervention includes: diagnosis of the situation (malaria epidemiology, characteristics of the population affected) to define the relevance of the strategy; determination of the stakeholders and the framework of the intervention (research project or public health intervention); adaptation modalities (adaptation of the kit, training, distribution strategy); the role of community health workers and their need for training and supervision. Finally, evaluation needs are specified in relation to prospects for geographical or temporal extension. Malaria elimination is likely to increasingly involve marginalized people due to climate change and displacement of populations. Evaluation of the transferability and effectiveness of the Malakit strategy in new contexts will be essential to increase and refine the evidence of its value, and to decide whether it could be an additional tool in the arsenal recommended in future WHO guidelines.

Keywords