Cancers (Jul 2022)

Zero Setup Margin Mask versus Frame Immobilization during Gamma Knife<sup>®</sup> Icon™ Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases

  • Tugce Kutuk,
  • Rupesh Kotecha,
  • Ranjini Tolakanahalli,
  • D Jay J. Wieczorek,
  • Yongsook C. Lee,
  • Manmeet S. Ahluwalia,
  • Matthew D. Hall,
  • Michael W. McDermott,
  • Haley Appel,
  • Alonso N. Gutierrez,
  • Minesh P. Mehta,
  • Martin C. Tom

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14143392
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 14
p. 3392

Abstract

Read online

We compared the clinical outcomes of BM treated with mask immobilization with zero-SM (i.e., zero-PTV) to standard zero-SM frame immobilization SRS. Consecutive patients with BM, 0.5–2.0 cm in maximal diameter, treated with single-fraction SRS (22–24 Gy) during March 2019–February 2021 were included. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression. A total of 150 patients with 453 BM met inclusion criteria. A total of 129 (28.5%) lesions were treated with a zero-SM mask immobilization and 324 (71.5%) with zero-SM frame immobilization. Frame immobilization treatments were associated with a higher proportion of gastrointestinal and fewer breast-cancer metastases (p = 0.024), and a higher number of treated lesions per SRS course (median 7 vs. 3; p p = 0.29) or multivariable analysis (p = 0.518). Actuarial FFLF at 1 year was 90.5% for mask and 92% for frame immobilization (p = 0.272). Radiation necrosis rates at 1 year were 12.5% for mask and 4.1% for frame immobilization (p = 0.502). For BM 0.5–2.0 cm in maximal diameter treated with single-fraction SRS using 22–24 Gy, mask immobilization with zero SM produces comparable clinical outcomes to frame immobilization. The initial findings support omitting a SM when using mask immobilization with this treatment approach on a Gamma Knife® Icon™.

Keywords