The Role of Different Total Water Level Definitions in Coastal Flood Modelling on a Low-Elevation Dune System

Abstract

The present study investigates different combinations and methods for estimating the extreme Total Water Level (TWL) and its implications for predicting flood extension caused by coastal storms. This study analyses various TWL components and approaches and assesses how different methodologies alter flood predictions, with implications for warning systems and emergency responses. Using different combinations of individual TWL components, flood extension simulations were conducted using a hydrodynamic model in the Volano Beach area (Emilia-Romagna, Italy). A real coastal storm event was used as a reference for comparison. The findings indicate that the selection of individual TWL components and calculation methods significantly impacts flood extension predictions. The approaches, which involve calculating extreme values from a combined time series or the water level time series plus the extreme value of wave setup, yield the most realistic results, excluding the runup component. In comparison, the other combinations overestimate the flood. Incorporating hydromorphological models like XBeach could enhance the accuracy of runup estimations and improve the overall method reliability. Despite limitations such as runup estimation and the use of generic regional parameters, this study underscores the importance of the TWL combination selection in accurately predicting flood extents, emphasising the need for context-specific adaptations in environmental contexts.

Keywords

• coastal flood
• extreme event
• Lisflood-FP
• total water level
• wave run-up
• Emilia-Romagna