Spine Surgery and Related Research (Nov 2024)

Comparative Analysis of Characteristics of Lower- and Mid-Cervical Spine Injuries in the Elderly

  • Naoki Segi,
  • Hiroaki Nakashima,
  • Sadayuki Ito,
  • Jun Ouchida,
  • Noriaki Yokogawa,
  • Takeshi Sasagawa,
  • Takeo Furuya,
  • Atsushi Yunde,
  • Toru Funayama,
  • Fumihiko Eto,
  • Kota Watanabe,
  • Satoshi Nori,
  • Shota Ikegami,
  • Masashi Uehara,
  • Ko Hashimoto,
  • Yoshito Onoda,
  • Hideaki Nakajima,
  • Hidenori Suzuki,
  • Yasuaki Imajo,
  • Tomohiro Yamada,
  • Tomohiko Hasegawa,
  • Kenichi Kawaguchi,
  • Yohei Haruta,
  • Yoshinori Terashima,
  • Ryosuke Hirota,
  • Hitoshi Tonomura,
  • Munehiro Sakata,
  • Yoichi Iizuka,
  • Hiroshi Uei,
  • Nobuyuki Suzuki,
  • Koji Akeda,
  • Hiroyuki Tominaga,
  • Shoji Seki,
  • Yasushi Oshima,
  • Takashi Kaito,
  • Bungo Otsuki,
  • Kazuo Nakanishi,
  • Kenichiro Kakutani,
  • Haruki Funao,
  • Toshitaka Yoshii,
  • Daisuke Sakai,
  • Tetsuro Ohba,
  • Masashi Miyazaki,
  • Hidetomi Terai,
  • Gen Inoue,
  • Seiji Okada,
  • Shiro Imagama,
  • Satoshi Kato

DOI
https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2024-0030
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 6
pp. 560 – 567

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Elderly patients have a higher frequency of upper cervical fractures caused by minor trauma; nevertheless, the clinical differences between mid- and lower-cervical (C6-C7) injuries are unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the epidemiology of lower- and mid-cervical injuries in the elderly. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study included 451 patients aged 65 years or older who had mid- or lower-cervical fractures/dislocations. Patients' demographic and treatment data were examined and compared based on mid- and lower-cervical injuries. Results: There were 139 patients (31%) with lower-cervical injuries and 312 (69%) with mid-cervical injuries. High-energy trauma (60% vs. 47%, p=0.025) and dislocation (55% vs. 45%, p=0.054) were significantly experienced more often by elderly patients with lower-cervical injuries than by patients with mid-cervical injuries. Although the incidence of key muscle weakness at the C5 to T1 levels were all significantly lower in patients with lower-cervical injuries than those with mid-cervical injuries, impairments at C5 occurred in 49% of them, and at C6, in 65%. No significant differences were found in the rates of death, pneumonia, or tracheostomy requirements, and no significant differences existed in ambulation or ASIA impairment scale grade for patients after 6 months of treatment. Conclusions: Elderly patients with lower-cervical fractures/dislocations were injured by high-energy trauma significantly more often than patients with mid-cervical injuries. Furthermore, half of the patients with lower-cervical injuries had mid-cervical level neurological deficits with a relatively high rate of respiratory complications.

Keywords