Ten years of incident reports on in-hospital cardiac arrest – Are they useful for improvements?

Abstract

Objectives: Staff in hospitals are encouraged to write up incident reports whenever they notice an incident. There are few published compilations of these reports from an in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) perspective. Aim: To describe content of incident reports over ten years in a two-sited university hospital in order to share knowledge and thereby being able to improve resuscitation systems in hospitals. Material and methods: All incident reports between 2010–June 2023 written at Karolinska University Hospital contain the words “CPR”, “cardiac arrest”, “resuscitation”, Do-Not–attend-CPR” (DNACPR), “life-sustaining treatment” were included for analysis. Reports were grouped into larger themes. Results: In all 588 reports was identified automatically by the hospitals system based on the totally selected keywords. The largest category was “Life-sustaining treatment” with 178 (30%) reports and thereafter “Preventing care” (117, 20%) and “Material” (80, 14%). Conclusion: Our hospital has clearly valued incident reports as a mean to track on-going issues and serious events over time as well as a source to trigger educational interventions. To improve patient safety, a standardized approach for compilation of reports and actions would be helpful when sharing knowledge between hospitals and with the resuscitation community.

Keywords

• IHCA
• Incident reports
• Continuous improvements