Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology (Jul 2024)

Efficacy of ferric carboxymaltose or darbepoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anemia in patients with esophagogastric or pancreaticobiliary cancer: a retrospective comparative study

  • Minkwan Cho,
  • Eunkyung Park,
  • Yong-Pyo Lee,
  • Hongsik Kim,
  • Hee Sue Park,
  • Hee Kyung Kim,
  • Yaewon Yang,
  • Jihyun Kwon,
  • Ki Hyeong Lee,
  • Hye Sook Han

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359241265209
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16

Abstract

Read online

Background: Esophagogastric and pancreaticobiliary cancers are associated with chronic blood loss, poor nutrition, and surgical interventions that interfere with iron absorption. Patients with these cancers often have a higher incidence of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) than patients with other malignancies. Objectives: To investigate the efficacy of intravenous iron or erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESA) for CIA treatment in patients with esophagogastric or pancreaticobiliary cancer. Design: Retrospective, comparative chart review of patients with esophagogastric or pancreaticobiliary cancer who received ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), or darbepoetin alfa (DA), and myelosuppressive chemotherapy at Chungbuk National University Hospital between June 2018 and December 2022. Methods: To assess the efficacy of FCM or DA over time, data on hemoglobin (Hb) levels were collected from the time of administration of FCM or DA (baseline) until 6 months post-baseline, when available. Results: In total, 214 patients (124 in the FCM and 90 in the DA group) were included in the analysis. The FCM group had a higher maximum Hb level and Hb changes for 3 months (mean ± standard deviation) following FCM or DA administration from baseline than the DA group (11.3 ± 1.5 versus 10.9 ± 1.2 g/dL, p = 0.02 and 2.0 ± 1.4 versus 1.5 ± 1.1 g/dL, p = 0.004, respectively). The FCM group had a higher proportion of Hb responders than the DA group (83.9% versus 68.9%, p = 0.013). Based on multivariable analysis, only the CIA treatment group was a significant factor for Hb response (odds ratio = 2.06, 95% confidence interval = 1.05–4.06, p = 0.036). Conclusion: Both FCM and DA are effective, and FCM showed a higher Hb response than DA for CIA treatment in patients with esophagogastric or pancreaticobiliary cancer. Therefore, further randomized controlled trials should determine the optimal treatment for CIA in patients with these cancers undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy.