Frontiers in Medicine (Apr 2023)

Prehospital qSOFA, mSOFA, and NEWS2 performance for sepsis prediction: A prospective, multi-center, cohort study

  • Laura Melero-Guijarro,
  • Ancor Sanz-García,
  • Ancor Sanz-García,
  • Francisco Martín-Rodríguez,
  • Francisco Martín-Rodríguez,
  • Francisco Martín-Rodríguez,
  • Vivian Lipari,
  • Vivian Lipari,
  • Cristina Mazas Perez Oleaga,
  • Cristina Mazas Perez Oleaga,
  • Cristina Mazas Perez Oleaga,
  • Stefanía Carvajal Altamiranda,
  • Stefanía Carvajal Altamiranda,
  • Stefanía Carvajal Altamiranda,
  • Nohora Milena Martínez López,
  • Nohora Milena Martínez López,
  • Nohora Milena Martínez López,
  • Irma Domínguez Azpíroz,
  • Irma Domínguez Azpíroz,
  • Irma Domínguez Azpíroz,
  • Miguel A. Castro Villamor,
  • Miguel A. Castro Villamor,
  • Miguel A. Castro Villamor,
  • Irene Sánchez Soberón,
  • Raúl López-Izquierdo,
  • Raúl López-Izquierdo,
  • Raúl López-Izquierdo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1149736
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundNowadays, there is no gold standard score for prehospital sepsis and sepsis-related mortality identification. The aim of the present study was to analyze the performance of qSOFA, NEWS2 and mSOFA as sepsis predictors in patients with infection-suspected in prehospital care. The second objective is to study the predictive ability of the aforementioned scores in septic-shock and in-hospital mortality.MethodsProspective, ambulance-based, and multicenter cohort study, developed by the emergency medical services, among patients (n = 535) with suspected infection transferred by ambulance with high-priority to the emergency department (ED). The study enrolled 40 ambulances and 4 ED in Spain between 1 January 2020, and 30 September 2021. All the variables used in the scores, in addition to socio-demographic data, standard vital signs, prehospital analytical parameters (glucose, lactate, and creatinine) were collected. For the evaluation of the scores, the discriminative power, calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used.ResultsThe mSOFA outperformed the other two scores for mortality, presenting the following AUCs: 0.877 (95%CI 0.841–0.913), 0.761 (95%CI 0.706–0.816), 0.731 (95%CI 0.674–0.788), for mSOFA, NEWS, and qSOFA, respectively. No differences were found for sepsis nor septic shock, but mSOFA’s AUCs was higher than the one of the other two scores. The calibration curve and DCA presented similar results.ConclusionThe use of mSOFA could provide and extra insight regarding the short-term mortality and sepsis diagnostic, backing its recommendation in the prehospital scenario.

Keywords