Implementation of a prosthetic labelling process in implant-supported fixed prosthesis and comparison of two different methods: an in vitro study

Abstract

Abstract Background This study is to compare the two different techniques used in the labeling of implant-based fixed prostheses, using the square code and using microchip labeling techniques, taking into account the properties of an ideal prosthetic labeling technique. Sixty implants fixed prostheses were produced, 30 for each group. Square codes were created on the lingual bands of implants fixed prostheses which are the samples of the group that were labelled by using square code, and microchips were placed in the implant abutments of the samples in the group that were labelled with the microchip. Results The thermal cycle test was used to compare the long-life cycle of the samples, and no deformation was found. A survey attended by 51 dentists was created to evaluate the techniques’ effects on their aesthetic appeal and their application. The data found was statistically evaluated, and the result was statistically insignificant (p < 0.05). Conclusions Microchips’ data storage capacity was found more successful; however, according to their resistance to heat and their costs, the square code, was more advantageous.

Keywords

• Labelling of dentures
• Forensic dentistry
• Prosthetic identification
• Dental implant