Matching Spring Phenology Indicators in Ground Observations and Remote-Sensing Metrics

Abstract

Accurate monitoring of leaf phenology, from individual trees to entire ecosystems, is vital for understanding and modeling forest carbon and water cycles, as well as assessing climate change impact. However, the accuracy of many remote-sensing phenological products remains difficult to directly corroborate using ground-based monitoring, owing to variations in the observed indicators and the scales used. This limitation hampers the practical implementation of remote-sensing phenological metrics. In our study, the start of growing season (SOS) from 2016 to 2021 was estimated for the continental USA using Sentinel-2 images. The results were then matched with several ground-based spring vegetation phenology metrics obtained by the USA National Phenology Network (USA-NPN). In this study, we focused on the relationships between the leaf-unfolding degree (LUD), the SOS, and the factors that drive these measures. Our results revealed that: (1) the ground-based leaves and increasing leaf size stages were significantly correlated with the SOS; (2) with the closest match being observed for a leaf spread of 13%; (2) the relationship between the SOS and LUD varied according to the species and ecoregion, and the pre-season cumulative radiation was found to be the main factor affecting the degree of matching between the ground observations and the metrics derived from the Sentinel-2 data. Our investigations provide a ground-based spring phenology metric that can be used to verify or evaluate remote-sensing spring phenology products and will help to improve the accuracy of remote-sensing phenology metrics.

Keywords

• spring phenology
• ground observation
• remote-sensing inversion
• environmental factors
• species