Advances in Medical Education and Practice (Jun 2024)

Implementing Formative Assessment in Human Anatomy Practical Sessions: Medical Students’ Perception and Effect on Final Exam Performance

  • Atwa HS,
  • Potu BK,
  • Fadel RA,
  • Deifalla AS,
  • Fatima A,
  • Othman MA,
  • Sarwani NAL,
  • Nasr El-Din WA

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 15
pp. 551 – 563

Abstract

Read online

Hani Salem Atwa,1,2 Bhagath Kumar Potu,3 Raouf Abdelrahman Fadel,3,4 Abdelhalim Salem Deifalla,3,4 Ayesha Fatima,3 Manal Ahmed Othman,3 Nasir Abdul Latif Sarwani,3 Wael Amin Nasr El-Din3,4 1Medical Education Department, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain; 2Medical Education Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt; 3Anatomy Department, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain; 4Department of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, EgyptCorrespondence: Hani Salem Atwa, Medical Education Department, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain, Tel +97335635809, Email [email protected]: Formative assessment with feedback is part of the assessment program in medical education to improve students’ learning. Limited research has focused on its application and impact on practical anatomy education.Methods: This study aimed to examine medical students’ perceptions of formative assessment in practical anatomy sessions of body systems-based educational units and explore its influence on final practical exam performance. A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted. Data was collected from 173 Year 2 medical students through a survey that addressed their perception of process and importance of formative assessment and feedback. The survey employed a 5-point Likert scale. Two open-ended questions were appended at the end of the survey. Students’ performance in Unit 3 (where formative assessment was conducted) was compared to their performance in Unit 2 (where no formative assessment was conducted) and with the performance of the previous academic year’s students in Unit 3 (where no formative assessment was conducted). Descriptive statistics were used. The level of statistical significance was set at p-value < 0.05. Responses to open-ended questions (qualitative data) were counted, categorized as themes, and presented as frequencies and percentages.Results: The survey showed high internal consistency, and its validity was established through exploratory factor analysis. Results showed that the mean mark for the unit with formative assessment and feedback was significantly higher than for the units without formative assessment and feedback. Students showed positive perception of formative assessment and feedback conducted after practical anatomy sessions. They reported useful insights regarding the benefits they gained from formative assessment and feedback as well as constructive suggestions for future improvements.Conclusion: The study indicates that students positively perceived formative assessment and feedback sessions after practical anatomy sessions. Findings also refer to a positive effect of formative assessment on students’ performance in summative practical assessment in anatomy.Keywords: anatomy education, anatomy practical sessions, formative assessment, feedback, exam performance

Keywords