The roles of patient‐derived xenograft models and artificial intelligence toward precision medicine
Venkatachalababu Janitri,
Kandasamy Nagarajan ArulJothi,
Vijay Murali Ravi Mythili,
Sachin Kumar Singh,
Parteek Prasher,
Gaurav Gupta,
Kamal Dua,
Rakshith Hanumanthappa,
Karthikeyan Kaliappan,
Krishnan Anand
Affiliations
Venkatachalababu Janitri
Department of Biomedical Engineering Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester New York USA
Kandasamy Nagarajan ArulJothi
Department of Genetic Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology SRM Institute of Science and Technology Chengalpattu Tamil Nadu India
Vijay Murali Ravi Mythili
Department of Genetic Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology SRM Institute of Science and Technology Chengalpattu Tamil Nadu India
Sachin Kumar Singh
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences Lovely Professional University Phagwara Punjab India
Parteek Prasher
Department of Chemistry University of Petroleum & Energy Studies, Energy Acres Dehradun India
Gaurav Gupta
Centre for Research Impact & Outcome, Chitkara College of Pharmacy Chitkara University Rajpura Punjab India
Kamal Dua
Faculty of Health, Australian Research Center in Complementary and Integrative, Medicine University of Technology Sydney Ultimo NSW Australia
Rakshith Hanumanthappa
JSS Banashankari Arts, Commerce, and SK Gubbi Science College Karnatak University Dharwad Karnataka India
Karthikeyan Kaliappan
Centre of Excellence in PCB Design and Analysis, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering M. Kumarasamy College of Engineering Karur Tamil Nadu India
Krishnan Anand
Department of Chemical Pathology, School of Pathology, Office of the Dean, Faculty of Health Sciences University of the Free State Bloemfontein South Africa
Abstract Patient‐derived xenografts (PDX) involve transplanting patient cells or tissues into immunodeficient mice, offering superior disease models compared with cell line xenografts and genetically engineered mice. In contrast to traditional cell‐line xenografts and genetically engineered mice, PDX models harbor the molecular and biologic features from the original patient tumor and are generationally stable. This high fidelity makes PDX models particularly suitable for preclinical and coclinical drug testing, therefore better predicting therapeutic efficacy. Although PDX models are becoming more useful, the several factors influencing their reliability and predictive power are not well understood. Several existing studies have looked into the possibility that PDX models could be important in enhancing our knowledge with regard to tumor genetics, biomarker discovery, and personalized medicine; however, a number of problems still need to be addressed, such as the high cost and time‐consuming processes involved, together with the variability in tumor take rates. This review addresses these gaps by detailing the methodologies to generate PDX models, their application in cancer research, and their advantages over other models. Further, it elaborates on how artificial intelligence and machine learning were incorporated into PDX studies to fast‐track therapeutic evaluation. This review is an overview of the progress that has been done so far in using PDX models for cancer research and shows their potential to be further improved in improving our understanding of oncogenesis.