Italian Journal of Medicine (Jun 2018)

Are multiple-choice questions a good tool for the assessment of clinical competence in Internal Medicine?

  • Flavio Tangianu,
  • Antonino Mazzone,
  • Franco Berti,
  • Giuliano Pinna,
  • Irene Bortolotti,
  • Fabrizio Colombo,
  • Carlo Nozzoli,
  • Micaela La Regina,
  • Antonio Greco,
  • Cristina Filannino,
  • Mauro Silingardi,
  • Roberto Nardi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2018.980
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 2
pp. 88 – 96

Abstract

Read online

There are many feasible tools for the assessment of clinical practice, but there is a wide consensus on the fact that the simultaneous use of several different methods could be strategic for a comprehensive overall judgment of clinical competence. Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are a well-established reliable method of assessing knowledge. Constructing effective MCQ tests and items requires scrupulous care in the design, review and validation stages. Creating high-quality multiple-choice questions requires a very deep experience, knowledge and large amount of time. Hereby, after reviewing their construction, strengths and limitations, we debate their completeness for the assessment of professional competence.

Keywords