Comparison of efficacy between robot-assisted laparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and analysis on influencing factors

Abstract

Objective To compare the therapeutic efficacy of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, and analyze the factors influencing treatment outcomes. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 719 patients (total cohort) who underwent radical prostatectomy in our department from June 2002 to October 2023. According to different surgical methods, they were divided into robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy group (robotic group, n=409) and conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy group (conventional group, n=310). Clinical characteristics, biochemical recurrence rates, and recovery of urinary continence at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, as well as sexual function recovery at 6 and 12 months after surgery, were compared between the 2 groups. Additionally, the factors influencing biochemical recurrence and urinary continence recovery were analyzed across the entire cohort. Results In the cohort, the robot group demonstrated significantly larger proportions of pathological high T stages (≥pT3, P 7, P=0.036), fewer lymph nodes dissected (≤10, P < 0.01), and positive lymph nodes (P=0.046) were independent risk factors for biochemical recurrence. Additionally, the surgical method, specifically robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, was identified as a significant factor influencing urinary continence recovery at 12 months postoperatively (P=0.005). Conclusion Compared to conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy shows certain effect on reducing biochemical recurrence rate and enhancing recovery of urinary continence in prostate cancer patients at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

Keywords

• prostate cancer
• robot
• laparoscopy
• radical prostatectomy
• postoperative efficacy