Psychological Test Adaptation and Development (Apr 2024)

Structural Validity Evidence for the Oxford Utilitarianism Scale Across 15 Languages

  • Briana Oshiro,
  • William H. B. McAuliffe,
  • Raymond Luong,
  • Anabela C. Santos,
  • Andrej Findor,
  • Anna O. Kuzminska,
  • Anthony Lantian,
  • Asil A. Özdoğru,
  • Balazs Aczel,
  • Bojana M. Dinić,
  • Christopher R. Chartier,
  • Jasper Hidding,
  • Job A. M. de Grefte,
  • John Protzko,
  • Mairead Shaw,
  • Maximilian A. Primbs,
  • Nicholas A. Coles,
  • Patricia Arriaga,
  • Patrick S. Forscher,
  • Savannah C. Lewis,
  • Tamás Nagy,
  • Wieteke C. de Vries,
  • William Jimenez-Leal,
  • Yansong Li,
  • Jessica Kay Flake

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/2698-1866/a000061
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 1
pp. 175 – 191

Abstract

Read online

Abstract: Background: The Psychological Science Accelerator (PSA) recently completed a large-scale moral psychology study using translated versions of the Oxford Utilitarianism Scale (OUS). However, the translated versions have no validity evidence. Objective: The study investigated the structural validity evidence of the OUS across 15 translated versions and produced version-specific validity reports. Methods: We analyzed OUS data from the PSA, which was collected internationally on a centralized online questionnaire. We also collected qualitative feedback from experts for each translated version. Results: For each version, we produced version-specific psychometric reports which include the following: (1) descriptive item and demographics analyses, (2) factor structure evidence using confirmatory factor analyses, (3) measurement invariance testing across languages using multiple-group confirmatory factor analyses and alignment optimization, and (4) reliability analyses using coefficients α and ω.

Keywords