Comparison of enucleation between thulium laser and holmium laser for benign prostatic hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Summary: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of Thulium laser enucleation of prostate (ThuLEP) and Holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP). We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases within a period from the date of database establishment to October 2020. RevMan 5.4. was used for calculation and statistical analyses. 8 studies of 2125 patients were included. ThuLEP provided less hemoglobin decrease (MD: −0.37, 95%CI -0.61 to −0.14, P = 0.002) and shorter length of hospital stay (MD: −0.41, 95%CI -0.72 to −0.10, P = 0.01). During the postoperative follow-ups, statistically significant differences only were found in IPSS (MD: −0.96; 95%CI -1.27 to −0.65; P < 0.00001) at the 3rd month. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that ThuLEP, compared with HoLEP, has better security, faster improvement of symptoms. However, our conclusions still require a larger sample size, multi-center, and longer follow-up randomized controlled trials to verify.

Keywords

• Benign prostatic hyperplasia
• Laser
• Enucleation
• ThuLEP
• HoLEP