Identification of implant outliers in joint replacement registries

Abstract

Total hip and knee replacement are effective operations for the management of end-stage arthritis. There are increasing numbers of these operations being performed, and the rate of increase is anticipated to continue into the future (1, 2, 3, 4). There is also a substantial rise in the lifetime risk of a person receiving a total hip or knee replacement and this has been shown in several countries (5, 6, 7, 8). There are a large number of joint replacement prostheses on the market available for use and not all perform the same. Many have no published outcomes. Joint replacement registries provide an appropriate way to monitor the real-world outcomes of these procedures and can provide comparative data on the rates of revision for specific prostheses. Revisions are generally defined in joint registries as a removal or exchange of a prosthesis or part thereof and provide an unambiguous record of a problem with the joint replacement. There are many factors that affect revision rates. Non-device-related issues may include patient factors, surgical technique, surgeon experience and volume of cases. Device-related factors may contribute to the variation in the rates of revision with individual prostheses.

Keywords

• joint registries
• outlier prostheses identification
• hip replacement
• knee replacement
• post-market surveillance