Psychology Research and Behavior Management (Jul 2022)

Development of the Nurse Occupational Stigma Scale

  • Yang L,
  • Zhang S,
  • Leng J,
  • Fan Z,
  • Luo Y

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 15
pp. 1627 – 1636

Abstract

Read online

Lu Yang,1 Shuangxin Zhang,1 Jiaqi Leng,2 Zhiguang Fan,2 Yi Luo1 1Department of Nursing, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun City, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Education, Jilin International Studies University, Changchun City, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Zhiguang Fan, Department of Education, Jilin International Studies University, Jingyue Street 3658, Changchun City, Jilin Province, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 1 594-831-4623, Fax +86 431-84924101, Email [email protected]: Occupational stigma toward nurses exerts a negative impact on the physical and mental health and work performance of nurses. However, hitherto, there has been no quantitative instrument designed to assess occupational stigma toward nurses.Objective: The present study aimed to develop the Nurse Occupational Stigma Scale (NOSS) and test its reliability and validity in the Chinese context.Methods: The items of the scale were formed through the open-ended interview and literature review. A questionnaire survey was administered among 765 patients using NOSS and the Caring Behaviors Inventory (CBI-24).Results: In the initial questionnaire, a total of 21 items were developed, and 5 items were dropped for cross-loadings. The formal scale consists of 16 items divided into three dimensions of negative label, nurse-patient relationship, and devaluation and discrimination. The results of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that the three-factor model fitted well (χ2/df=2.635, RMSEA=0.064, RFI=0.926, CFI=0.962, NFI=0.941, IFI=0.953). The total scores of the NOSS and the scores of all dimensions were significantly negatively correlated with the scores of the CBI-24. The internal consistency coefficients of the scale and all dimensions were between 0.827– 0.920, and the split-half reliability coefficients were between 0.826– 0.942. The NOSS had the measurement invariance across gender.Conclusion: With its good reliability and validity, the NOSS can be an appropriate instrument for researchers to conduct studies about nurse occupational stigma.Keywords: nurse, occupational stigma, reliability, validity

Keywords