Kappa statistic considerations in evaluating inter-rater reliability between two raters: which, when and context matters

Abstract

Abstract Background In research designs that rely on observational ratings provided by two raters, assessing inter-rater reliability (IRR) is a frequently required task. However, some studies fall short in properly utilizing statistical procedures, omitting essential information necessary for interpreting their findings, or inadequately addressing the impact of IRR on subsequent analyses’ statistical power for hypothesis testing. Methods This article delves into the recent publication by Liu et al. in BMC Cancer, analyzing the controversy surrounding the Kappa statistic and methodological issues concerning the assessment of IRR. The primary focus is on the appropriate selection of Kappa statistics, as well as the computation, interpretation, and reporting of two frequently used IRR statistics when there are two raters involved. Results The Cohen’s Kappa statistic is typically utilized to assess the level of agreement between two raters when there are two categories or for unordered categorical variables with three or more categories. On the other hand, when it comes to evaluating the degree of agreement between two raters for ordered categorical variables comprising three or more categories, the weighted Kappa is a widely used measure. Conclusion Despite not substantially affecting the findings of Liu et al.?s study, the statistical dispute underscores the significance of employing suitable statistical methods. Rigorous and accurate statistical results are crucial for producing trustworthy research.

Keywords

• RECIST 1.1 criteria
• Liver metastases
• DWI
• Intra-rater reliability
• Kappa statistic
• Cohen’s Kappa