Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease (Apr 2024)

Discordance Between Very Low‐Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Low‐Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Increases Cardiovascular Disease Risk in a Geographically Defined Cohort

  • Kristina E. Seehusen,
  • Alan T. Remaley,
  • Maureen Sampson,
  • Jeffrey W. Meeusen,
  • Nicholas B. Larson,
  • Paul A. Decker,
  • Jill M. Killian,
  • Paul Y. Takahashi,
  • Véronique L. Roger,
  • Sheila M. Manemann,
  • Reyna Lam,
  • Suzette J. Bielinski

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.031878
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 8

Abstract

Read online

Background Clinical risk scores are used to identify those at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Despite preventative efforts, residual risk remains for many individuals. Very low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL‐C) and lipid discordance could be contributors to the residual risk of ASCVD. Methods and Results Cardiovascular disease–free residents, aged ≥40 years, living in Olmsted County, Minnesota, were identified through the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) and VLDL‐C were estimated from clinically ordered lipid panels using the Sampson equation. Participants were categorized into concordant and discordant lipid pairings based on clinical cut points. Rates of incident ASCVD, including percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, stroke, or myocardial infarction, were calculated during follow‐up. The association of LDL‐C and VLDL‐C with ASCVD was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Interaction between LDL‐C and VLDL‐C was assessed. The study population (n=39 098) was primarily White race (94%) and female sex (57%), with a mean age of 54 years. VLDL‐C (per 10‐mg/dL increase) was significantly associated with an increased risk of incident ASCVD (hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.05–1.09]; P<0.001]) after adjustment for traditional risk factors. The interaction between LDL‐C and VLDL‐C was not statistically significant (P=0.11). Discordant individuals with high VLDL‐C and low LDL‐C experienced the highest rate of incident ASCVD events, 16.9 per 1000 person‐years, during follow‐up. Conclusions VLDL‐C and lipid discordance are associated with a greater risk of ASCVD and can be estimated from clinically ordered lipid panels to improve ASCVD risk assessment.

Keywords