Religions (Oct 2022)

An Explanation and Defense of the Free-Thinking Argument

  • Timothy A. Stratton,
  • J. P. Moreland

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13100988
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 10
p. 988

Abstract

Read online

This paper is a defense of the big ideas behind the free-thinking argument. This argument aims to demonstrate that determinism is incompatible with epistemic responsibility in a desert sense (being praised or blamed for any thought, idea, judgment, or belief). This lack of epistemic responsibility is problematic for the naturalist. It seems to be an even worse problem, however, for the exhaustive divine determinist because not only would humanity not stand in a position to be blamed for any of our thoughts and beliefs, but it also surfaces a “problem of epistemic evil”, which can be raised against the knowledge of God, the rationality of humans, and the trustworthiness of Scripture.

Keywords