NeuroSAFE PROOF: study protocol for a single-blinded, IDEAL stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer
Eoin Dinneen,
Jack Grierson,
Ricardo Almeida-Magana,
Rosie Clow,
Aiman Haider,
Clare Allen,
Daniel Heffernan-Ho,
Alex Freeman,
Tim Briggs,
Senthil Nathan,
Susan Mallett,
Chris Brew-Graves,
Nicola Muirhead,
Norman R. Williams,
Elena Pizzo,
Raj Persad,
Jon Aning,
Lyndsey Johnson,
Jon Oxley,
Neil Oakley,
Susan Morgan,
Fawzia Tahir,
Imran Ahmad,
Lorenzo Dutto,
Jonathan M. Salmond,
Anand Kelkar,
John Kelly,
Greg Shaw
Affiliations
Eoin Dinneen
Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London
Jack Grierson
Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London
Ricardo Almeida-Magana
Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London
Rosie Clow
Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London
Aiman Haider
University College Hospital London, Department of Histopathology
Clare Allen
University College Hospital London, Department of Urology, Westmoreland Street Hospital
Daniel Heffernan-Ho
University College Hospital London, Department of Urology, Westmoreland Street Hospital
Alex Freeman
University College Hospital London, Department of Histopathology
Tim Briggs
University College Hospital London, Department of Urology, Westmoreland Street Hospital
Senthil Nathan
University College Hospital London, Department of Urology, Westmoreland Street Hospital
Susan Mallett
Division of Medicine, University College London
Chris Brew-Graves
Division of Medicine, University College London
Nicola Muirhead
Division of Medicine, University College London
Norman R. Williams
Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London
Elena Pizzo
Department of Applied Health Research, University College London
Raj Persad
North Bristol Hospitals Trust, Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Lane, Westbury-on-Trym
Jon Aning
North Bristol Hospitals Trust, Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Lane, Westbury-on-Trym
Lyndsey Johnson
North Bristol Hospitals Trust, Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Lane, Westbury-on-Trym
Jon Oxley
North Bristol Hospitals Trust, Department of Histopathology, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Lane, Westbury-on-Trym
Neil Oakley
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Susan Morgan
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Histopathology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Fawzia Tahir
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Histopathology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Imran Ahmad
Glasgow & Clyde NHS Trust, Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Lorenzo Dutto
Glasgow & Clyde NHS Trust, Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Jonathan M. Salmond
Glasgow & Clude NHS Trust, Department of Histopathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Anand Kelkar
University College Hospital London, Department of Urology, Westmoreland Street Hospital
John Kelly
Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London
Greg Shaw
Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London
Abstract Background Robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a first-line curative treatment option for localized prostate cancer. Postoperative erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence are common associated adverse side effects that can negatively impact patients’ quality of life. Preserving the lateral neurovascular bundles (NS) during RARP improves functional outcomes. However, selecting men for NS may be difficult when there is concern about incurring in positive surgical margin (PSM) which in turn risks adverse oncological outcomes. The NeuroSAFE technique (intra-operative frozen section examination of the neurovascular structure adjacent prostate margin) can provide real-time pathological consult to promote optimal NS whilst avoiding PSM. Methods NeuroSAFE PROOF is a single-blinded, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) in which men are randomly allocated 1:1 to either NeuroSAFE RARP or standard RARP. Men electing for RARP as primary treatment, who are continent and have good baseline erectile function (EF), defined by International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score > 21, are eligible. NS in the intervention arm is guided by the NeuroSAFE technique. NS in the standard arm is based on standard of care, i.e. a pre-operative image-based planning meeting, patient-specific clinical information, and digital rectal examination. The primary outcome is assessment of EF at 12 months. The primary endpoint is the proportion of men who achieve IIEF-5 score ≥ 21. A sample size of 404 was calculated to give a power of 90% to detect a difference of 14% between groups based on a feasibility study. Oncological outcomes are continuously monitored by an independent Data Monitoring Committee. Key secondary outcomes include urinary continence at 3 months assessed by the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire, rate of biochemical recurrence, EF recovery at 24 months, and difference in quality of life. Discussion NeuroSAFE PROOF is the first RCT of intra-operative frozen section during radical prostatectomy in the world. It is properly powered to evaluate a difference in the recovery of EF for men undergoing RARP assessed by patient-reported outcome measures. It will provide evidence to guide the use of the NeuroSAFE technique around the world. Trial registration NCT03317990 (23 October 2017). Regional Ethics Committee; reference 17/LO/1978.