Trials (Jul 2022)

NeuroSAFE PROOF: study protocol for a single-blinded, IDEAL stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer

  • Eoin Dinneen,
  • Jack Grierson,
  • Ricardo Almeida-Magana,
  • Rosie Clow,
  • Aiman Haider,
  • Clare Allen,
  • Daniel Heffernan-Ho,
  • Alex Freeman,
  • Tim Briggs,
  • Senthil Nathan,
  • Susan Mallett,
  • Chris Brew-Graves,
  • Nicola Muirhead,
  • Norman R. Williams,
  • Elena Pizzo,
  • Raj Persad,
  • Jon Aning,
  • Lyndsey Johnson,
  • Jon Oxley,
  • Neil Oakley,
  • Susan Morgan,
  • Fawzia Tahir,
  • Imran Ahmad,
  • Lorenzo Dutto,
  • Jonathan M. Salmond,
  • Anand Kelkar,
  • John Kelly,
  • Greg Shaw

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06421-7
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 16

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a first-line curative treatment option for localized prostate cancer. Postoperative erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence are common associated adverse side effects that can negatively impact patients’ quality of life. Preserving the lateral neurovascular bundles (NS) during RARP improves functional outcomes. However, selecting men for NS may be difficult when there is concern about incurring in positive surgical margin (PSM) which in turn risks adverse oncological outcomes. The NeuroSAFE technique (intra-operative frozen section examination of the neurovascular structure adjacent prostate margin) can provide real-time pathological consult to promote optimal NS whilst avoiding PSM. Methods NeuroSAFE PROOF is a single-blinded, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) in which men are randomly allocated 1:1 to either NeuroSAFE RARP or standard RARP. Men electing for RARP as primary treatment, who are continent and have good baseline erectile function (EF), defined by International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score > 21, are eligible. NS in the intervention arm is guided by the NeuroSAFE technique. NS in the standard arm is based on standard of care, i.e. a pre-operative image-based planning meeting, patient-specific clinical information, and digital rectal examination. The primary outcome is assessment of EF at 12 months. The primary endpoint is the proportion of men who achieve IIEF-5 score ≥ 21. A sample size of 404 was calculated to give a power of 90% to detect a difference of 14% between groups based on a feasibility study. Oncological outcomes are continuously monitored by an independent Data Monitoring Committee. Key secondary outcomes include urinary continence at 3 months assessed by the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire, rate of biochemical recurrence, EF recovery at 24 months, and difference in quality of life. Discussion NeuroSAFE PROOF is the first RCT of intra-operative frozen section during radical prostatectomy in the world. It is properly powered to evaluate a difference in the recovery of EF for men undergoing RARP assessed by patient-reported outcome measures. It will provide evidence to guide the use of the NeuroSAFE technique around the world. Trial registration NCT03317990 (23 October 2017). Regional Ethics Committee; reference 17/LO/1978.

Keywords