Journal of Hematology & Oncology (Aug 2022)

Genotype–phenotype associations within the Li-Fraumeni spectrum: a report from the German Registry

  • Judith Penkert,
  • Farina J. Strüwe,
  • Christina M. Dutzmann,
  • Beate B. Doergeloh,
  • Emilie Montellier,
  • Claire Freycon,
  • Myriam Keymling,
  • Heinz-Peter Schlemmer,
  • Birte Sänger,
  • Beatrice Hoffmann,
  • Tanja Gerasimov,
  • Claudia Blattmann,
  • Sebastian Fetscher,
  • Michael Frühwald,
  • Simone Hettmer,
  • Uwe Kordes,
  • Vita Ridola,
  • Sabine Kroiss Benninger,
  • Angela Mastronuzzi,
  • Sarah Schott,
  • Juliane Nees,
  • Aram Prokop,
  • Antje Redlich,
  • Markus G. Seidel,
  • Stefanie Zimmermann,
  • Kristian W. Pajtler,
  • Stefan M. Pfister,
  • Pierre Hainaut,
  • Christian P. Kratz

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-022-01332-1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 1
pp. 1 – 5

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a cancer predisposition syndrome caused by pathogenic TP53 variants. The condition represents one of the most relevant genetic causes of cancer in children and adults due to its frequency and high cancer risk. The term Li-Fraumeni spectrum reflects the evolving phenotypic variability of the condition. Within this spectrum, patients who meet specific LFS criteria are diagnosed with LFS, while patients who do not meet these criteria are diagnosed with attenuated LFS. To explore genotype–phenotype correlations we analyzed 141 individuals from 94 families with pathogenic TP53 variants registered in the German Cancer Predisposition Syndrome Registry. Twenty-one (22%) families had attenuated LFS and 73 (78%) families met the criteria of LFS. NULL variants occurred in 32 (44%) families with LFS and in two (9.5%) families with attenuated LFS (P value < 0.01). Kato partially functional variants were present in 10 out of 53 (19%) families without childhood cancer except adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) versus 0 out of 41 families with childhood cancer other than ACC alone (P value < 0.01). Our study suggests genotype–phenotype correlations encouraging further analyses.

Keywords