Digital Health (Jun 2024)

Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction in artificial intelligence based on left ventricular opacification

  • Ye Zhu,
  • Zisang Zhang,
  • Junqiang Ma,
  • Yiwei Zhang,
  • Shuangshuang Zhu,
  • Manwei Liu,
  • Ziming Zhang,
  • Chun Wu,
  • Chunyan Xu,
  • Anjun Wu,
  • Chenchen Sun,
  • Xin Yang,
  • Yonghuai Wang,
  • Chunyan Ma,
  • Jun Cheng,
  • Dong Ni,
  • Jing Wang,
  • Mingxing Xie,
  • Wufeng Xue,
  • Li Zhang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241260557
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

Background Left ventricular opacification (LVO) improves the accuracy of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by enhancing the visualization of the endocardium. Manual delineation of the endocardium by sonographers has observer variability. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve the reproducibility of LVO to assess LVEF. Objectives The aim was to develop an AI model and evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of LVO in the assessment of LVEF. Methods This retrospective study included 1305 echocardiography of 797 patients who had LVO at the Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Union Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology from 2013 to 2021. The AI model was developed by 5-fold cross validation. The validation datasets included 50 patients prospectively collected in our center and 42 patients retrospectively collected in the external institution. To evaluate the differences between LV function determined by AI and sonographers, the median absolute error (MAE), spearman correlation coefficient, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated. Results In LVO, the MAE of LVEF between AI and manual measurements was 2.6% in the development cohort, 2.5% in the internal validation cohort, and 2.7% in the external validation cohort. Compared with two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), the left ventricular (LV) volumes and LVEF of LVO measured by AI correlated significantly with manual measurements. AI model provided excellent reliability for the LV parameters of LVO (ICC > 0.95). Conclusions AI-assisted LVO enables more accurate identification of the LV endocardium and reduces observer variability, providing a more reliable way for assessing LV function.