Journal of Clinical Medicine (Jun 2022)

Uterine Septum with or without Hysteroscopic Metroplasty: Impact on Fertility and Obstetrical Outcomes—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Research

  • Marco Noventa,
  • Giulia Spagnol,
  • Matteo Marchetti,
  • Carlo Saccardi,
  • Giulio Bonaldo,
  • Antonio Simone Laganà,
  • Francesco Cavallin,
  • Alessandra Andrisani,
  • Guido Ambrosini,
  • Salvatore Giovanni Vitale,
  • Luis Alonso Pacheco,
  • Sergio Haimovich,
  • Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo,
  • Jose Carugno,
  • Marco Scioscia,
  • Simone Garzon,
  • Stefano Bettocchi,
  • Giovanni Buzzaccarini,
  • Roberto Tozzi,
  • Amerigo Vitagliano

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123290
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 12
p. 3290

Abstract

Read online

Objective: we performed a systematic review/meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of septate uterus and hysteroscopic metroplasty on pregnancy rate-(PR), live birth rate-(LBR), spontaneous abortion-(SA) and preterm labor (PL) in infertile/recurrent miscarriage-(RM) patients. Data sources: a literature search of relevant papers was conducted using electronic bibliographic databases (Medline, Scopus, Embase, Science direct). Study eligibility criteria: we included in this meta-analysis all types of observational studies that evaluated the clinical impact of the uterine septum and its resection (hysteroscopic metroplasty) on reproductive and obstetrics outcomes. The population included were patients with a diagnosis of infertility or recurrent pregnancy loss. Study appraisal and synthesis methods: outcomes were evaluated according to three subgroups: (i) Women with untreated uterine septum versus women without septum (controls); (ii) Women with treated uterine septum versus women with untreated septum (controls); (iii) Women before and after septum removal. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the outcome measures. A p-value p p p p = 0.0004). (ii) treated versus untreated septum: PR and PL were not different in removed vs. unremoved septum(OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.49–2.49; p = 0.82 and OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.35–1.86; p = 0.62); a lower proportion of SA was associated with removed vs. unremoved septum (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.21–1.04; p = 0.001); (iii) before-after septum removal: the proportion of LBR was higher after the removal of septum (OR 49.58, 95% CI 29.93–82.13; p p p < 0.0001) Conclusions: the results show the detrimental effect of the uterine septum on PR, LBR, SA and PL. Its treatment reduces the rate of SA.

Keywords