Scientific Reports (Jan 2021)

Proposal and validation of a method to classify genetic subtypes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma

  • Lucía Pedrosa,
  • Ismael Fernández-Miranda,
  • David Pérez-Callejo,
  • Cristina Quero,
  • Marta Rodríguez,
  • Paloma Martín-Acosta,
  • Sagrario Gómez,
  • Julia González-Rincón,
  • Adrián Santos,
  • Carlos Tarin,
  • Juan F. García,
  • Francisco R. García-Arroyo,
  • Antonio Rueda,
  • Francisca I. Camacho,
  • Mónica García-Cosío,
  • Ana Heredero,
  • Marta Llanos,
  • Manuela Mollejo,
  • Miguel Piris-Villaespesa,
  • José Gómez-Codina,
  • Natalia Yanguas-Casás,
  • Antonio Sánchez,
  • Miguel A. Piris,
  • Mariano Provencio,
  • Margarita Sánchez-Beato

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80376-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 1
pp. 1 – 14

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous disease whose prognosis is associated with clinical features, cell-of-origin and genetic aberrations. Recent integrative, multi-omic analyses had led to identifying overlapping genetic DLBCL subtypes. We used targeted massive sequencing to analyze 84 diagnostic samples from a multicenter cohort of patients with DLBCL treated with rituximab-containing therapies and a median follow-up of 6 years. The most frequently mutated genes were IGLL5 (43%), KMT2D (33.3%), CREBBP (28.6%), PIM1 (26.2%), and CARD11 (22.6%). Mutations in CD79B were associated with a higher risk of relapse after treatment, whereas patients with mutations in CD79B, ETS1, and CD58 had a significantly shorter survival. Based on the new genetic DLBCL classifications, we tested and validated a simplified method to classify samples in five genetic subtypes analyzing the mutational status of 26 genes and BCL2 and BCL6 translocations. We propose a two-step genetic DLBCL classifier (2-S), integrating the most significant features from previous algorithms, to classify the samples as N12-S, EZB2-S, MCD2-S, BN22-S, and ST22-S groups. We determined its sensitivity and specificity, compared with the other established algorithms, and evaluated its clinical impact. The results showed that ST22-S is the group with the best clinical outcome and N12-S, the more aggressive one. EZB2-S identified a subgroup with a worse prognosis among GCB-DLBLC cases.