Is uterine preservation combined with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy to promote subsequent fertility safe in infiltrative mucinous ovarian cancer?

Abstract

According to the latest World Health Organization classification (2014), mucinous ovarian cancers should be classified histologically as being either expansile or infiltrative. Compared to other epithelial cancers, both of these mucinous patterns are diagnosed, in the main, at an early stage, although they can affect relatively young patients. The infiltrative subtype is characterized by a morphologically and clinically more aggressive disease versus the expansile form. Consequently, even in young patients who would prefer fertility sparing management, the removal of both ovaries (even for a unilateral tumor) remains a common recommendation. However case reports describing the preservation of the uterus for a further potential pregnancy (following oocyte donation) have now been described. In this series, we present six patients treated for stage I mucinous infiltrative cancer using bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with uterine preservation. All but one patient underwent 1-step (n = 1) or 2-step (n = 4) surgery, including peritoneal and nodal (4 patients) procedures. Disease stages were IA (n = 2), IC1 (n = 1), IC2 (n = 2), or IC3 (n = 1). While two patients subsequently became pregnant, two patients also suffered disease recurrence. For one patient, recurrence was at the pelvic peritoneum. For the second patient, an ultimately lethal disease recurrence involved the uterine serosa with nodal involvement. The results of this short series lead us to question the safety of this uterine-preserving strategy.

Keywords

• Expansile
• Infiltrative
• Mucinous
• Ovarian cancer
• Recurrence
• Staging
• Uterine preservation