A tool for estimating ground-based InSAR acquisition characteristics prior to monitoring installation and survey and its differences from satellite InSAR

Abstract

Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) acquisition can be performed from satellites or from the ground by means of a so-called GB-InSAR (Ground-Based Interferometry SAR), but the signal emission and the output image geometry slightly differ between the two acquisition modes. Those differences are rarely mentioned in the literature. This paper proposes to compare satellite and GB-InSAR in terms of (1) acquisition characteristics and parameters to consider; (2) SAR image resolution; and (3) geometric distortions that are foreshortening, layover, and shadowing. If in the case of satellite SAR, the range and azimuth resolutions are known and constant along the orbit path, in the case of GB-InSAR their values are terrain-dependent. It is worth estimating the results of a GB-InSAR acquisition that one can expect in terms of range and azimuth resolution, line of sight (LoS) distance, and geometric distortions to select the best installation location when several are possible. We developed a novel tool which estimates those parameters from a digital elevation model (DEM), knowing the GB-InSAR and the slope of interest (SoI) coordinates. This tool, written in MATLAB, was tested on a simple synthetic point cloud representing a cliff with a progressive slope angle to highlight the influence of the SoI geometry on the acquisition characteristics and on two real cases of cliffs located in Switzerland, namely one in the Ticino canton and one in the Vaud canton.