Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (May 2022)

Brief Research Report: Quantitative Analysis of Potential Coronary Microvascular Disease in Suspected Long-COVID Syndrome

  • Patrick Doeblin,
  • Patrick Doeblin,
  • Fridolin Steinbeis,
  • Cian M. Scannell,
  • Collin Goetze,
  • Sarah Al-Tabatabaee,
  • Jennifer Erley,
  • Alessandro Faragli,
  • Felix Pröpper,
  • Martin Witzenrath,
  • Thomas Zoller,
  • Thomas Zoller,
  • Christian Stehning,
  • Holger Gerhardt,
  • Holger Gerhardt,
  • Javier Sánchez-González,
  • Ebraham Alskaf,
  • Titus Kühne,
  • Titus Kühne,
  • Burkert Pieske,
  • Burkert Pieske,
  • Burkert Pieske,
  • Carsten Tschöpe,
  • Carsten Tschöpe,
  • Carsten Tschöpe,
  • Amedeo Chiribiri,
  • Sebastian Kelle,
  • Sebastian Kelle,
  • Sebastian Kelle

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.877416
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundCase series have reported persistent cardiopulmonary symptoms, often termed long-COVID or post-COVID syndrome, in more than half of patients recovering from Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19). Recently, alterations in microvascular perfusion have been proposed as a possible pathomechanism in long-COVID syndrome. We examined whether microvascular perfusion, measured by quantitative stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), is impaired in patients with persistent cardiac symptoms post-COVID-19.MethodsOur population consisted of 33 patients post-COVID-19 examined in Berlin and London, 11 (33%) of which complained of persistent chest pain and 13 (39%) of dyspnea. The scan protocol included standard cardiac imaging and dual-sequence quantitative stress perfusion. Standard parameters were compared to 17 healthy controls from our institution. Quantitative perfusion was compared to published values of healthy controls.ResultsThe stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) was significantly lower [31.8 ± 5.1 vs. 37.8 ± 6.0 (μl/g/beat), P < 0.001] and the T2 relaxation time was significantly higher (46.2 ± 3.6 vs. 42.7 ± 2.8 ms, P = 0.002) post-COVID-19 compared to healthy controls. Stress MBF and T1 and T2 relaxation times were not correlated to the COVID-19 severity (Spearman r = −0.302, −0.070, and −0.297, respectively) or the presence of symptoms. The stress MBF showed a U-shaped relation to time from PCR to CMR, no correlation to T1 relaxation time, and a negative correlation to T2 relaxation time (Pearson r = −0.446, P = 0.029).ConclusionWhile we found a significantly reduced microvascular perfusion post-COVID-19 compared to healthy controls, this reduction was not related to symptoms or COVID-19 severity.

Keywords