BMC Medicine (Aug 2018)

Exploring causality in the association between circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D and colorectal cancer risk: a large Mendelian randomisation study

  • Yazhou He,
  • Maria Timofeeva,
  • Susan M. Farrington,
  • Peter Vaughan-Shaw,
  • Victoria Svinti,
  • Marion Walker,
  • Lina Zgaga,
  • Xiangrui Meng,
  • Xue Li,
  • Athina Spiliopoulou,
  • Xia Jiang,
  • Elina Hyppönen,
  • Peter Kraft,
  • Douglas P. Kiel,
  • The SUNLIGHT consortium,
  • Caroline Hayward,
  • Archie Campbell,
  • David Porteous,
  • Katarina Vucic,
  • Iva Kirac,
  • Masa Filipovic,
  • Sarah E. Harris,
  • Ian J. Deary,
  • Richard Houlston,
  • Ian P. Tomlinson,
  • Harry Campbell,
  • Evropi Theodoratou,
  • Malcolm G. Dunlop

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1119-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Whilst observational studies establish that lower plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) levels are associated with higher risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), establishing causality has proven challenging. Since vitamin D is modifiable, these observations have substantial clinical and public health implications. Indeed, many health agencies already recommend supplemental vitamin D. Here, we explore causality in a large Mendelian randomisation (MR) study using an improved genetic instrument for circulating 25-OHD. Methods We developed a weighted genetic score for circulating 25-OHD using six genetic variants that we recently reported to be associated with circulating 25-OHD in a large genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis. Using this score as instrumental variable in MR analyses, we sought to determine whether circulating 25-OHD is causally linked with CRC risk. We conducted MR analysis using individual-level data from 10,725 CRC cases and 30,794 controls (Scotland, UK Biobank and Croatia). We then applied estimates from meta-analysis of 11 GWAS of CRC risk (18,967 cases; 48,168 controls) in a summary statistics MR approach. Results The new genetic score for 25-OHD was strongly associated with measured plasma 25-OHD levels in 2821 healthy Scottish controls (P = 1.47 × 10− 11), improving upon previous genetic instruments (F-statistic 46.0 vs. 13.0). However, individual-level MR revealed no association between 25-OHD score and CRC risk (OR 1.03/unit log-transformed circulating 25-OHD, 95% CI 0.51–2.07, P = 0.93). Similarly, we found no evidence for a causal relationship between 25-OHD and CRC risk using summary statistics MR analysis (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.69–1.19, P = 0.48). Conclusions Despite the scale of this study and employing an improved score capturing more of the genetic contribution to circulating 25-OHD, we found no evidence for a causal relationship between circulating 25-OHD and CRC risk. Although the magnitude of effect for vitamin D suggested by observational studies can confidently be excluded, smaller effects sizes and non-linear relationships remain plausible. Circulating vitamin D may be a CRC biomarker, but a causal effect on CRC risk remains unproven.

Keywords