Ophthalmology Science (Jun 2022)

Synthetic Medical Images for Robust, Privacy-Preserving Training of Artificial Intelligence

  • Aaron S. Coyner, PhD,
  • Jimmy S. Chen, MD,
  • Ken Chang, PhD,
  • Praveer Singh, PhD,
  • Susan Ostmo, MS,
  • R. V. Paul Chan, MD, MSc,
  • Michael F. Chiang, MD, MA,
  • Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, PhD,
  • J. Peter Campbell, MD, MPH

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. 2
p. 100126

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: Developing robust artificial intelligence (AI) models for medical image analysis requires large quantities of diverse, well-chosen data that can prove challenging to collect because of privacy concerns, disease rarity, or diagnostic label quality. Collecting image-based datasets for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), a potentially blinding disease, suffers from these challenges. Progressively growing generative adversarial networks (PGANs) may help, because they can synthesize highly realistic images that may increase both the size and diversity of medical datasets. Design: Diagnostic validation study of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for plus disease detection, a component of severe ROP, using synthetic data. Participants: Five thousand eight hundred forty-two retinal fundus images (RFIs) collected from 963 preterm infants. Methods: Retinal vessel maps (RVMs) were segmented from RFIs. PGANs were trained to synthesize RVMs with normal, pre-plus, or plus disease vasculature. Convolutional neural networks were trained, using real or synthetic RVMs, to detect plus disease from 2 real RVM test datasets. Main Outcome Measures: Features of real and synthetic RVMs were evaluated using uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP). Similarities were evaluated at the dataset and feature level using Fréchet inception distance and Euclidean distance, respectively. CNN performance was assessed via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC); AUCs were compared via bootstrapping and Delong’s test for correlated receiver operating characteristic curves. Confusion matrices were compared using McNemar’s chi-square test and Cohen’s κ value. Results: The CNN trained on synthetic RVMs showed a significantly higher AUC (0.971; P = 0.006 and P = 0.004) and classified plus disease more similarly to a set of 8 international experts (κ = 0.922) than the CNN trained on real RVMs (AUC = 0.934; κ = 0.701). Real and synthetic RVMs overlapped, by plus disease diagnosis, on the UMAP manifold, showing that synthetic images spanned the disease severity spectrum. Fréchet inception distance and Euclidean distances suggested that real and synthetic RVMs were more dissimilar to one another than real RVMs were to one another, further suggesting that synthetic RVMs were distinct from the training data with respect to privacy considerations. Conclusions: Synthetic datasets may be useful for training robust medical AI models. Furthermore, PGANs may be able to synthesize realistic data for use without protected health information concerns.

Keywords